That’s Right Nate

Thoughts from a right thinker.

Why Congressman Kimble Opposes Sotomayor

with 2 comments

[I thought this was a really good summation of the problem with activist liberal judges so I took the liberty of copying this letter from the Congressman’s own blog–Kimble’s Corner]

To the Conservative Blogging Community:

In the House of Representatives, we are a bit separated from the entire confirmation process for Supreme Court Justices. However, we’ve always got C-Span handy albeit usually to check how we look on the tv. I personally have been working hard on sponsoring a House Bill in response to the Brownback and Landrieu bill currently in the Senate which will forever protect our shores from Koala Men and other animal-human hybrid creatures, but I still have found time to watch the Sotomayor hearings.

I believe with all my heart that the role of a Supreme Court Justice is to be follow the values and principles of our founding fathers. You don’t need a fancy law book or even a Constituion to do that. That’s why there is no requirement that a Supreme Court Justice be a judge or even a lawyer.

Liberals believe in appointing activist judges who use precedent as a reason for changing things. If you listened to Sotomayor today, she ducked behind every tough question about the firefighter case by claiming precedent. You know who else followed precedent? The pharisees who persecuted Jesus. Is that the role model we want for our Supreme Court Justices? Surely, in the vast history of our country you can find a precedent for anything, but is that how we really want our laws to be interpreted? It seems to me that precedent is just another way for liberals to change the way this country runs. We need non-activist Judges who base their decisions on the values of our founding fathers and not on precedent.

Fortunately, this is not something that we are powerless over. I can tell you from first hand experience that congressmen pay very close attention to emails they receive especially from people who aren’t even in their district. If the email is particularly angry or is written anonymously, it is particularly persuassive. You have have an impact on the Senate Judiciary Committee by emailing them anonymously with your displeasure over Sotomayor. If you use exclamation marks and bold or capital letters to make your point so much the better. I don’t have a vote on this. For this decision, I’m just an ordinary person like you people. If we are going to get her rejected, it’s going to have to come from you.

Representative Jack Kimble (R-CA)


2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I’m glad we have Congressman Kimball to give us the facts: “You know who else followed precedent? The pharisees who persecuted Jesus”. Truer words were never spoken.

    Congressman Kimball when is your next teabagging weenie fest? It sounds like good Christian fun!!!


    July 14, 2009 at 4:50 pm

  2. I’m a big fan of the Congressman, but I’m afraid he took a bath with all those wieners on the 4th of July. It’s a shame I’m not in California or I would have been there.


    July 15, 2009 at 7:02 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: